2/21/2006

Official ontheborderline.net Mascot Suffers "Accidental" Drug Overdose While Staying At Bob Z's Commune

at 2/21/2006 Posted by JPN

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Mr. Mudslinger you must be new on this site. I've been checking in here regularly and haven't seen your name. Have you been posting under anonymous names like the Anti-Whatever? Did you finally grow some hair on your chin and finally decided to stick it out?

February 22, 2006
Anonymous said...

Dear Bob, I seem to have touch a sensitive nerve. From the letters you write in the paper, I thought you'd have a little thicker skin. You do raise a good question though.

Why don't I use my real name? Because I don't want to stick my chin out like you just did. If you have previously done posts or comments on this blog, you didn't use your real name. Some suddenly you get religion and everybody else has to jump on your self-righteous bandwagon or forever be condemned a pussy. My goodness, you're a regular Jimmy Swaggart!

Anyways, I protect my identity because I am involved in a community group in New Richmond, some of us are active on the Hudson borderline blog site. I don't want you to know who I am, because I am a member of the New Richmond school district and our group is trying to bring change to the school district. Change for the good of the district.

Using an anonymous name when I blog allows me the freedom to attack our enemies on the NR school board. I sign my name to letters to the editor, but I say things on the blog I would never say in a letter to the editor. If I did use my real name on the blog, people could look up my number in the phone book and call me in the middle of the night. There are crazy people out there.

So I use an anonymous name. My dog isn't in you Hudson battle. I'll people in our group in New Richmond have differing objectives, most of us want to get the majority of the current board members off the board. We will do whatever it takes to get rid of those board members. They will pay for what they did to a couple of highly qualified administrators. It's too bad they paid off Hitchens, it would have been nice to have him to kick around and humiliate for an extra six months.

Some in our group might say they are "doing it for the kids." The Yes groupies say that to. You say that and the other blog says that. I care about the kids but I'm in this to do it to the adults that have ruined a couple of careers of dedicated public servants and I'm obviously not talking about Hitchens.

Those cold kiddie posts, that was done to make the school officials look bad and to hold it against the board. Except for BB and JR, they're a herd of deer caught in the headlights. They don't know which way to turn. Psychotherapy at the taxpayers expense won't help them. We are going to run them off the plantation and we are going to do it for the parents!

I might be a coward, but I'm a smart coward. You are like another Bob who doesn't know when to put his pen down and give the readers of the letters to editors in Hudson and New Richmond a break. You both think you're characters, but you're more like a caricatures.

February 22, 2006
Anonymous said...

Jack,

I am puzzled that you would blast Muchlinski for his willingness to stick up for Hudson Educators when you in fact yourself are doing the same thing in New Richmond? If you questioning him for calling you a name that is one thing but he has consistently stuck up for educators in our district which you claim is your hell bent reason to get adults off the board. What is the difference?

February 22, 2006
Anonymous said...

I'm not sticking up for educators! We are trying to remove school board members who have did some good people wrong. They were administrators not educators. We'll deal with the "educators" next.

February 22, 2006
Anonymous said...

"I'll people in our group in New Richmond have differing objectives, most of us want to get the majority of the current board members off the board."

You never could write Jack, I see trying to teach you was a waste of my time.

February 22, 2006
Anonymous said...

"I'm not sticking up for educators! We are trying to remove school board members who have did some good people wrong."

"Who have did" ? Please translate from
borderliner to English......
P.S.I'm not Muchlinski.

February 23, 2006
Anonymous said...

Administrators are educators!

February 23, 2006
Anonymous said...

Much:

That sums up what I've said quite well. Considering the forum we are using, what part of that list doesn't make sense to you? Think about what is trying to be accomplished here. On our side of the blog, we are not trying to have our minds changed and it appears that you are not going to change your mind.

You appear to be someone who has been involved in this school battle for sometime. Has anything changed in your mind that makes you think that the other side has some valid points. It doesn't appear to be the case. Maybe you have seen some valid points, but you would admit it because it would make you look like you are caving in.

February 23, 2006
JPN said...

I'm going to have to give more Viagra to the OTBL mascot. I suppose mentioning Ziller's name draws a crowd.

Concerning Jack's last statement, as a former participant at the OTBL blog, I always thought there was some thought provoking information to be considered. However, few seemed to want to discuss the issues. Many wanted to attack me and call me a solcialist (they are still doing that) and try to shut me up. I've even read thinks by Ziller that indicated he felt the same way about their threat of those that have different tastes in Kool-Aid. Maybe the problem over there is they want to change everything at once.

We are talking about institutions in our nation that were born before 1776. They go back a long way. You can expect everybody to swallow your whole program at once. There are complicated issues and a great deal of debate based on emotion rather than the facts.

Maybe Jack should give us provide Mr. M with the borderliners agenda.

February 23, 2006
Anonymous said...

Jack = "That sums up what I've said quite well. Considering the forum we are using, what part of that list doesn't make sense to you?"

Geeze Jack when you put it that way.
How could anyone not agree!

What was that forum again?
A Saddam Hussein advisory council meeting?

No need for desparaging words against you from us Jack, my friend.
Your own words speak volumes and do more than an adaquate job of desparaging you.
Thanks for you "insights"

February 23, 2006

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)