Min. Wage Jobs Outlook- Improving
Apply at: Jobs@ontheborderline.nut.
Please include resume' and 15 examples of errors you've discovered.
Errors marked with #2 Red Sharpee only.
Compensation commensurate with lack of civility.
10/17/2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
35 comments:
It looks like Butch made one more mistake. Shouldn't his Political Action Committee be named "Friends of Hudson Public EDUCATORS" instead?
Hey that is funny stuff anonymous. Ridicule a pillar of the community for wanting to be involved in local school matters and not hide behind an anonymous blog name.
You sir anonymous are out of your league
by the way, nice pink headband and short shorts. Your neighbors cringe whenever you run past.
anonymous,
You should start a new group of critics. The Enemies of Hudson Public Education. E.O.H.P.E (pronounced OhPEE )
BTW, don't confuse me with funny stuff
I'm funny guy.
Anon, you can't be funny you're just sad.
You better check your facts anon.
Since these people are not members of the NEA you might want to reconsider posting fallicious comments about them.
Hey, I never said that! Somebody changed my post!
Let's add liar to your resume!
It's nice to see that there are two weights on the balance scale:
1. The Anti-Teachers Union Thugs
2. The Teachers Union Thugs
or
1. The Duct Tape Wearing Thugs
2. The Non-duct tape wearing thugs
Looks like anon's a bit touchy even though nobody's named him here don't you think?
"You don't have to see the other person you are demeaning."
Cato - I know it's easy to demean people on the internet because you can't see them - but is it OK to do so if I already know what the prick looks like?
Cato:
Give me your name and address and I'll be right over.
Ah, the quintessential anonymous blogger Cato advises us to meet face-to-face to discuss our differences.
Therein lies the irony, think you not?
Cato is correct but very short sighted when craving civil debate in Hudson. It is what all reasonable community members want, but the actions of a few have ruined it and caused some similar behavior by some on the other side of the issue. It manifested itself first in a hatred for our school district, administration and more recently our police officers and at St. Pat's. Those throwing the most mud became irate when questioned and have shown no control in how far they will go to smear those that speak for issues that they are against. It should be noted that some in our community were involved in all the recent lightning rod issues in Hudson. The St. Pat's school principal fiasco, the Father Ryan scandal, the school board meeting outbursts, and the police handling of that incident. Look no further than to who was involved with all those issues. Shameful. We have two people in Hudson that actually called the employers of people who have disagreed with them in an attempt to get them fired. Gutless.
Cato should not be called names by those that also accuse others as being namecallers. Cato should be heard, but if his words make no sense, and he keeps repeating them, we have the option of being critical of his words in a civil manner, not calling his employer and trying to get him fired.
Please comment if you think that I am off base here.
Humbug, dear Cato, humbug I say.
You say remain civil. So I become a simple civilian? Not a sinister villain? I ask you: Can I be rude or demean you? Can I ruefully circumvene you? Can I moodily despleen you?
No no no, you cry! Stay back - evil cur, oh my!
You say your dark face and masked name will stay a blur to me! You're soul remains sinister to me!
But alas, my 12-year-old mind, longs to bully your kind.
So your advice I will surely not mind.
CATO:
Looks like you're the only adult to set an example here.
Cato?!? An adult example!?!
I'll lay you even money he's bawlin' like a newborn babe right now!
Too bad. So sad.
I disagree with Cato philosophically on varying issues, and agree with him/her (?) on some, but I do give Cato credit for debating topics.
As a person I'm not sure who Cato is, as have many of us, Cato has opted to maintain anonymity. That does generate some open (perhaps at times politically incorrect)debate, and some buffoonery; but by-golly I'm ok, you're ok, we're all ok.
Now as for Luke; Luke is not ok!
Luke is DEFINITELY NOT OK!
CATO:
So why do you argue the extremes?
Is it to stimulate discussion on the opposite side. Is it for the thrill of victory? Just curious?
I will say that dispite the fact that I find some of the views you have expressed ridiculous (from my perspective and sometimes a pragmatic one)you have for the most part expressed them without becoming vitriolic. I will commend you for that.
CATO:
I have to say it's hard for me to wrap my mind around your position. Sure spending has gone up, but where has it gone? To huge corporate interests, not infrastructure or social programs to help the poor. The Fake based initiative was exactly that, a huge mokery of those who supported it for the political gain of the current regime.
Frankly, I've never heard anyone argue from your position in the past. To me it's new phenomenon. It was unthinkable even a couple years ago that anyone would seriously consider "privitizing" education. I think for the vast majority it still is.
When you think about the current "borrow and spend" regime that harkens back to the Reagan model, who really owns that debt. It's not all the Chinese. It's wealthy investors in goverment securities, the same people who have been given historic tax breaks. They win at both ends, and the working middle class see it's benefits cut, it's wages cut it's standard of living cut, and their jobs cut. I found it difficult to understand a few years ago why companies were so reluctant to raise prices. Today, it's no problem and it's at a time when consumer's ability to pay is decreasing.
I also would never have heard FDR demonized even 5 years ago. Now it's the new national sport. Take him off the nickle and put the amiable dunce on instead?
I just can't see how you can possibly argue that the country is to the left (yet, hopefully that will change soon with the upcoming backlash against the Republicans)
Correction,
I meant take FDR of the Dime.
Ridicule, threats, intimidation and coercion- these are the traits of NEA UNION THUGS like Butch Schultz, Bob Muchlinsk and Bob Baumman.
Anon,
Thanks for you insightful addition to this discussion.
Ridicule, threats, intimidation, coercion, suprise, fear, ruthless efficiency, an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope, a shrubbery, and an albatross!
These are the weapons of the NEA Union Thugs!
I say give anonymous the Comfy Chair!
3 community members who believe in quality public education are called "NEA union thugs" by an anonymous commentor.
Yet Mark Pribonic calls the taxpayers/community members that attend the annual meeting "sheep" and then fails in a school boared election in Hudson. Pribonic then promisses a "new Dawn in education" for the New Richmond schools which is followed by the resignations of all the board member that he supported.
Bill Danielson re-names the city of Hudson as "Nazi Wisconsin" and calls our police officers "intellectual midgets" then moves out of town.
Marion Shaw claims that the county sherrif office had its furniture arranged in a manner to intimidate him when he was trying to get out of a traffic ticket, he then tries to intimidate everyone by shoving a video camera in their faces at any public funtion and accuses everyone but him and his wife as people trying to frame Father Ryan Erickson. Mike Frase allegedly allows good friend Curt Weese to ghost write letters to the editor under his name. There are too many Weese quotes to list here.
lets just say every villiage has one and Curt is ours.
anonymous seems to give these guys a free ride on the bad behavior spectrum.
CATO:
Capitalist monopolists buy off Congress to control internet.
http://tinyurl.com/tfmty
So which is worse?
CATO:
Despite your claims to the contrary, you must be a wealthy man.
When the Premium guys start pumping realtime audio and video and you are redirected to the text only browser I'd think you'd sing a different tune.
You really are afraid of a level playing field for some reason.
On every issue you always favor the side that will result in the Cadillac goods and sevices for the few, and the Yugo for the rest of us.
Also for an aethiest you certainly have a lot of faith in the hairy invisible 3 fingered claw of the market.
I think you'd be hard pressed to find any other issue where the NRA and MoveOn.org are on the same side.
http://tinyurl.com/yky2v9
As stated here. AT&T didn't invent the internet anymore than Al Gore.
Who are the loosers?
For one the content providers. Now they don't pay other than to produce and host their content. They will pay to transmit it there is no net neutrality. This issue has created some strang bedfellows. Microsoft and Google against AT&T.
AT&T and many other owners of the backbone made promises to states to
build directly to the home. It has never happened in this country but has in others.
From Bill Moyers "The Internet at Risk"
http://tinyurl.com/y7b7br
RICK KARR: The United States is the birthplace of the Internet and the home of high-tech, but we're no longer tops in the world in high-speed online connections. In fact, the U.S. has dropped below tenth place and compared to some other countries, we're pretty much crawling along the information superhighway.
BRUCE KUSHNICK: America's screwed. I mean we basically are becoming technologically deficient.
RICK KARR: Telecom analyst Bruce Kushnick says that the only thing the U.S. is doing quickly is falling behind.
BRUCE KUSHNICK: Right now what we have basically is sort of like, you know, still pictures versus what's really going to happen next which is full motion video everywhere. We're close to the dinosaurs compared to what these other countries are going to be developing in the next couple years.
RICK KARR: Kushnick says that's because telephone companies back in the 1990s promised that they'd hook us up to the information superhighway, but then reneged on that promise.
RICK KARR: The network that they promised to build, what could it do? Give us a sense of had they actually built this network what could we have on our homes today?
-------------------------
"Declan McCullagh of Wired News says the Net goes back as far as 1967 when Al gore was 19 years old. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency started experimenting with ways to allow networked computers to link and communicate. It was called The Internetting project and the ultimate system became known as The Internet."
So the internet began as a government project. The Fat Cats shouldn't be allowed to take over control
It is a pathetic statement about one’s life when the guage of their happiness is relative to what other’s have or have not. If the rationale for government is based on cable channel selections, then I can give no better reason for its demise.
Luke,
You should be the last one in the world to make such a statement with your envy of the "Cadillac Health Care" and "Platinum Retirement Plan". Then you post teacher compensations repeatedly for the last year out of jealousy.
What a HYPOCRITE!!!
P.S. It's gauge not guage you twit!
sorry, I thought I had checked my spelling. Your aaumption about being Luke is as wrong about your premise of happiness.
At least I earn my happiness. I do not depend on a thievery to acquire it.
If you're not Luke, then I'm sorry.
As for the other anonymous (if there
are two?)...........
Even though teaching is not my profession, educating children for the future is the farthest thing from thievery, unlike being a profit skimming internet middleman who offers no added value to a customer and has time to waste harassing public servants.
Also, if you've "earned" you happiness you are equally as materialistic as you accuse the poster commenting about the future of the internet.
As you say, happiness isn't dependent on things.
Spelling...
Everyone makes mistakes. But if you're Luke you make mistakes then criticize others for the same but not your own. Look at the OTBL post at the head of thread.
Post a Comment