
The violence in the Middle East has provided the neo- conservatives with a pretext for actions they've long sought to promote -- war with Iran. But contrary to conventional wisdom in Washington, the casus belli of the neo-conservatives -- that Iran ordered the Hezbollah attack -- is questionable. In fact, Iran stands to lose far more than it could gain from Hezbollah's provocation of Israel. With a much weakened Hezbollah, Tehran will feel exposed to a potential Israeli or American attack on Iran.
Israel has chosen to use Hezbollah's action to launch a major sustained attack calculated to destroy or substantially weaken Hezbollah as well as much of Lebanon's civilian infrastructure. The Israelis may have concluded that a U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities is inevitable or desirable and therefore they've decided to preempt an anticipated Hezbollah retaliatory attack.
But as with the Neo-cons recommendations on Iraq, the initial military objectives may be very clear. The aftermath, however, is a different story. Absent any open lines of communication between the U.S. and Iran, what started with a Hezbollah attack on Israel, and continued with a major Israeli offensive against Lebanon, may end up in a disastrous regional war. Washington and Tehran should prevent events from spiraling out of control by opening those necessary channels of communication."
Dr. Trita Parsi, Ph.D.,
author of "Treacherous Triangle - The Secret Dealings of Iran, Israel and the United States"
Dr. Parsi is one of the few people in the U.S. -- if not the only one -- that has traveled both to Iran and Israel and interviewed top officials in these countries on the state of Israeli-Iranian relations. He has conducted more than 110 interviews with senior Israeli, Iranian and American officials in all three countries. He is fluent in Persian/Farsi.
No comments:
Post a Comment