
Evidently the high priest had a conversation with the acting HSO editor that wasn't leading to the hoped-for result, i.e. getting his way. An OTBL'er ain't happy and it sounds like someone in the conversation was being way too curt. (Note: Wasn't there an incident in Hudson last June where two people would not play be Roberts Rules of Order at a Hudson school board meeting and had to leave early? Didn't we hear this same old censorship whine back then?)

You can go to the OTBL web site to read this complete post.
It's interesting that an OTBL'er would expect a news organization to be "fair and balanced," considering the number of posts OTBL does that are linked to FOX News. "Cut throat politics?"...that sounds like what OTBL'ers do on a daily basis. As the outhouse keepers of individual liberty and boot-lickers of liaise-faire selfishness, it's baffling that the OTBL blog site would allow a private business like the HSO to be shamelessly attacked for running it's business the way it sees fit. That would be like me calling up someone who runs a business on the internet, telling them how they should run their business and then getting mad at the business owner for not doing it my way. That's nuts!
Of course, as followers of the aimless ramblings and incoherent rantings of the discarded and discredited political and economical hearsay that litter the OTBL archives, we at this blog site have come to expect the extremist belligerence of their hypocritical tirades. Simply put, OTBL babies pout when they don't get their way.
OTBL'ers please note, a newspaper can print what it chooses. You send in the letter and the editors makes ANY tweaks they see fit. I've submitted many letters to the editors and I haven't always been happy with, or understood the rationale behind, the editing. If you're going to play in the letter to the editor game, you've got to play by the rules. The rules are made up by the newspaper and these rules can change like the wind.
Enough of my soapboxing, on to the hypocrisy on the borderline. Let's say you want to join in the conversation, discussion, debate, pity party, etc. at OTBL. You click a little box on the left side of the blog site that says REGISTER. Once in there it will ask for you name, phone number, etc. After filling in this info, you get to read the "fine print" of the hypocritical, "free speech" practiced at OTBL. (Note: Whenever I read or hear an OTBL'er use the phrase "free speech," I substitute the phrase "cheap talk.")
It reads as follows:

---
Maybe my powers of interpretation are flawed somehow, but the OTBL rules of engagement seem to cover the same thing their high priest is complaining about above. They will slice and dice your comments to fit their political spin and, if you don't toe their line, they'll kick you off the blog. Now Chris Kilber, the administrator of the OTBL blog has stated in posts before that his blog is a "private blog" and the conversation that goes on within the confines of his blog is private and not open to the public. Of course, he writes letters to the editor and tells everybody to come visit his blog and see what a wonderful asset it is for expanding and enhancing the community's conversation. Piss and lemonade look the same from a distance, but taste it and you'll learn the difference. Ditto for OTBL.
No OTBL'ers, this isn't an issue of censorship. This is a case where the home owner shot the dog in the ass with a BB gun to keep him from pooping on the lawn. Now the dog is back in the OTBL kennel howling indignation and the other dogs are intermittently joining in the chorus and licking the wounded dog's backside.
Always remember, the OTBL'ers portray themselves as "freedom loving " guys who speak only in the best, benevolent interest of those of us who make up the ignorant masses. "Freedom" is the mantra chanted by the OTBL bloggers as they exercises the iron fist
of conformity and delete all who enter that blog speaking positively about public education, unions or bettering the community.

programming geek who provides space at the shallow end of the social/political/economical cesspool for anti-community misfits who continue to try to pawn off their desperate dog paddling as Olympic-style synchronized swimming. Maybe it's time the OTBL'ers stop humiliating mongrel dogs by using one as their mascot. Maybe they should instead adopt Hal from "2001: A Space Odyssey" as their mascot.
What a crock!
Not only do they not tolerate freedom, but they are entirely against it. They are to the point where they are so absolutely sure that they are right about everything that no one else should have a say. It’s frightening, really.
ReplyDeleteCheck out Bob Z's post at ontheborderline.net. I think he takes offense to the truth.
ReplyDelete